Sunday, February 11, 2007

Not all invasive species are exotics


We often think of invasive or noxious species as exotic species that have come to a new area from some far off place-examples include the starling, fire ants, zebra and quabba mussels, or kudzu. Indeed here in Eastern Kansas its difficult to find a habitat that doesn't have it's complement of these sorts of invasive species. Yet some native species have characteristics of invasive species. A good example in Kansas is the red cedar.

Red cedar is not a true cedar but is a juniper (Juniperis virginiana). I've always had mixed feelings about this tree. On the one hand it is great for many species of wild birds since it both provides shelter and food in the form of these berries from a USDA website:

When relatively scarce it can provide a nice contrast in the land scape. On the other hand it is very invasive. For instance I don't have any red cedars in my yard but have to constantly fight the seedlings in my garden. It seems they just happen to germinate in those areas of the garden where I have my prized butterfly weed growing-an invasive species battle on the small scale. Red Cedar's native range is throughout much of the Eastern United States and west through Central Kansas. Indeed, the Red cedar is Kansas' only native conifer. A good range map is here from the United States Geological Survey's website.


So if it is a native species-why is it classed as an invasive species? First of all it is an exotic invasive species in certain parts of the United States, in both Oregon and Hawaii. Next within its and around its native range, the Red Cedar is spreading into grassland systems where it allegedly reduces the productivity of range land by altering the microclimate around the trees which encourages the growth of less desirable non native cool season grasses, according to the Nebraska Extension Service.

The Red Cedar may also be allelopathic, that is produce chemicals that inhibit the growth of other plants, Stipe, Dan J and Thomas Bragg(1989). Allelopathy may be an important reason for the success of many exotic plant species. This idea is termed the "Novel weapons hypothesis", Calloway R and W. Ridenour (2004. By the way red cedar is the source of cedar for hope chests and pet beddings and the 'cedar oil' because of it's repellent effect on insects, Schmidt, T and Wardle T (2002).



The Nebraska Extension Service has some interesting tidbits on control. Complete eradication is not feasible and probably not desirable. Fire seems to be the most effective control where feasible especially when the trees are small. The extension service also says that goats have been used as control, and recommends 10 goats per acre in lands that can be fenced and expect to let the goats graze for several years or else the trees will recover.



This image shows my own little cedar problem. These seedlings appear to have germinated from mulch I obtained from the City of Lawrence's mulch program or from a local garden store.

So what we have in red cedar is a species, that has at least some of the characteristics of more traditional invasive species: adaptability to many habitats, suitability as an early successional species, rapid dispersal, ability to crowd out other species by direct competition for resources by altering microclimate and indirectly by allelopathy. Further the spread of this species into new habitats appears to be related to human interference with these habitats. In the case of red cedar and the prairie ecosystems its spread appears to be facilitated by suppression of the fires that maintain the open prairie combined with loss of large grazing herbivores especially the bison, an issue discussed by Collins et al(1998).

Whether red cedar is called an invasive species or just a noxious species really hides the more important issue, that the ecosystems of this planet are being altered by human activity at an increasingly rapid rate, bringing about unpredictable changes in the ecosystems of this planet. This is true even in the absence of the current focus on global warming. Like it or not we are creating a global flora and fauna, consisting of those relatively few species who just happen to have a mix of characteristics that enables them to survive the effect of human disturbance.

My own belief is that we are long passed the point where most of the planet's ecosystems, at least terrestrial and freshwater aquatic systems, are robust enough to survive the rapid changes we as a species are making without management. We can talk about creating reserves to preserve some remnant of biodiversity as E.O. Wilson has, but unless we have a global consensus that we need to manage the affects of human disturbance, the long term prospects for maintaining some significant fragment of biodiversity at all levels of scale are not good.

By the way if you are interested in keeping up with the latest on invasive species, Dr. Jennifer Orth has a wonderful blog called appropriately the Endangered Species Weblog. (oops update! Poor Jennifer...as Dave points out it's Invasive Species Weblog....)



Other links:

Calloway R and W. Ridenour (2004) "Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability" Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment: Vol. 2, No. 8, pp. 436–443.


Collins S L, Alan K. Knapp, John M. Briggs, John M. Blair, Ernest M. Steinauer (1998) "Modulation of Diversity by Grazing and Mowing in Native Tallgrass Prairie"
Science. Vol 280 pp 745-747.

Schmidt, T and Wardle T (2002) "Impact of Pruning Eastern Redcedar
(Juniperus virginiana) " Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 17, No. 4,pp 189-193.

Stipe, Dan J and Thomas Bragg(1989). "Effect of eastern red cedar on seedling establishment of prairie plants" in Prairie pioneers : ecology, history and culture : proceedings of the Eleventh North American Prairie Conference pp. 101-102).

http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=JUVI&photoID=juvi_004_ahp.tif

http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=JUVI

http://esp.cr.usgs.gov/data/atlas/little/

http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/index.html

http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/junivir.pdf

http://www.r6.fws.gov/pfw/r6pfw15.htm

Technorati Tags:




9 comments:

Gaia Gardener: said...

I have a real issue with labeling redcedar as an invasive species in Kansas. It is a part of the normal Kansas flora, where it has traditionally been held in balance primarily by fire. For decades Kansas farmers and ranchers have understood that and have either burned their grasslands or physically cut down the cedars to control their spread. In fact, I was taught to judge a landowner's land management abilities at least partly by how overrun their pastures were by redcedars - a pasture overrun by cedars being a definite sign of poor land management.

This is the second time in less than a month that I've seen eastern redcedar, Juniperus virginiana, labeled an invasive species in Kansas. The first time was in an article in the Wiohita Eagle, where it was being blamed for groundwater depletion and labeled as a scourge equal to or worse than the Dust Bowl Days and the historical grasshopper swarms.

I think that labeling this plant as invasive is just an excuse by certain elements of the agricultural community to 1)justify attacking the species with herbicides and 2) to try to shift blame for groundwater and surface water shortages away from human overappropriation and overuse, often by those same agricultural interests.

I know that redcedars are a nuisance, and I've pulled and cut out many a cedar seedling or sapling myself. In fact, we've just bought a new home, complete with a 5 acre pasture that has redcedars speckled liberally throughout it. And we've started cutting them out. But a weed is just a plant out of place, and I love redcedars in their proper place. Let's not put a negative label on a plant that encourages us to "throw out the baby with the bathwater," metaphorically speaking.

Paul D. said...

Thanks Gala,

Good comment and I see what you are saying. but more and more endemic species are behaving as invasives. Here is another example:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0301/p13s01-sten.html

I like red cedars as well, and calling them invasive may be a bit like blaming the victim. After all its spread is probably due to changes in the natural ecosystems some of which are of course human induced.

So this invasiveness is perhaps an immediate opportunistic response to human disturbance. In some of these situations the response may well be an evolutionary response.

Gaia Gardener: said...

Interesting article about "didymo". A two part issue -1) its population explosion within its normal range, and 2) its invasiveness as an introduced species. They've seemingly done a reasonable job figuring out why didymo is showing up in new places, but I'd like to see more research on why it's getting out of control within its normal range.

If more and more endemics are acting as invasives (and they certainly seem to be), it would further suggest that the environment is changing quite a bit. I wish we'd devote some more research time and money to figuring out what's driving the boat there, although I suspect that we, as a society, don't really want to know!

Not that we seem to feel any obligation to act upon the knowledge that we already have....

Returning to eastern redcedar, I've been thinking that it is one of the few woody prairie plants that does not handle fire well. Most prairie species resprout back without too much trouble from growing points located at or near the soil surface, or they are protected by corky bark or other adaptations. Could that mean that redcedar is a more recent addition to the prairie flora? I'd be interested to know from pollen studies or other research just how recently redcedar moved into the prairie ecosystem. Any idea if my hunch is correct?

Paul D. said...

Gaia,

I agree with you about the role of environmental change in the behavior of some of these endemic species. To me that is one of the interesting things about species as diverse as didymo and red cedar.

See my additional
post.

And yes, I suspect that red cedar is a recent addition to the prairie flora-it doesn't seem particularly fire adapted.

Anonymous said...

the Endangered Species Weblog.
Oops! You mean "Invasive Species Weblog."

Thanks for a thought-provoking post (and discussion). I guess I feel there should be another term for native plants that go apeshit like this, to distinguish them from aliens. Here in PA, two good examples would be hayscented and New York ferns. They too release allopathogens, and carpet forest floors in many areas. Their prolifereation seems due in large part to overbrowsing by deer, but also changes in soil chemistry from acid deposition and increased light levels as a result of management for black cherry and other forest management practices.

Paul D. said...

Oops Dave you are right about Invasive species weblog....hmmmmm now ferns as invasive species..but you're right. As for the name...maybe we do need away to distinguish these endemics from aliens but they do share invasive characteristics and may end up as successes in the reduced flora and fauna we are inadavertently encouraging.

Genevieve Netz said...

I found this article and its comments interesting and informative, especially after blogging just a few days ago (from my strictly amateur viewpoint) about redcedars becoming a problem in Kentucky as well as in the Sandhills of Nebraska where I grew up. Redcedar used to be called a "pioneer species" but it's probably time to consider a different label.

Anonymous said...

I have been told that the "ONLY" way Eastern red cedar seeds can germinate In nature Is when birds eat the seeds then deposit them. I was told that seeds that fall off the tree and land on the ground can't germinate at all, Is this true? Now Im not talking someone collecting the seeds and doing It that way, Im simply talking about In nature. It would seem to me that the seeds that fall to the ground that some would be able to germinate without having to be eatin by a bird or animal.

Paul D. said...

Anon,

I am not sure about red cedar but my understanding is that many times seed germination is inhibited right underneath the parent tree, perhaps chemically.